A Greek-British team of archaeologists have unearthed a cache of deliberately broken prehistoric statues that could help finally solve the Keros riddle. This barren islet was of major importance to the mysterious Cycladic people, a sophisticated pre-Greek civilization with no written language that flourished 4,500 years ago and produced strikingly modern-looking artwork. Out of all the documented statues — known as Cycladic figurines — in museums and collections worldwide, more than half were found there.
     New excavations by a Greek-British team of archaeologists have unearthed a cache of prized prehistoric statues — all deliberately broken — that could help finally solve the Keros riddle. When they were unearthed, the white marble shards were jumbled close together like a pile of bleached bones. British excavation leader Colin Renfrew now believes Keros was a hugely important religious site where the smashed artwork was ceremoniously deposited. "What we do have clearly is what must be recognized as the earliest regional ritual center in the Aegean," he said.
     There is no evidence that the Cycladic culture worshipped the Greek gods of Mount Olympus — who first appeared in the 2nd millennium BCE — and their beliefs are shrouded in mystery as no sanctuaries dating to before 2000 BCE have been excavated. However, some experts believe that the islanders' religion was probably built round a fertility cult related to the mother-goddess of neolithic times, whose worship survived in various forms until Christian times in the Greco-Roman world. The Cycladic statues — many of which depict pregnant women — may have played a part in such beliefs, and their deliberate destruction would have been a ritual act.
     During excavations in the spring and early summer, Renfrew's team found an undisturbed trove of figurines missed by looters who ransacked the islet in the 1950s and '60s. They all had been deliberately smashed around 2500 BCE. "We've got hundreds of marble bowl fragments and many dozens of figurine fragments, which don't seem to fit together," said Renfrew, an emeritus professor of archaeology at Cambridge University and former director of the McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
     The excavation disproves theories that the artifacts came from cemeteries — as no human bones were found — or were wantonly broken by modern vandals. "We can say that the breakages are definitely old," Renfrew said. "(The figurines) weren't smashed there because (then) you'd find the bits together, and there's differential weathering which suggests that not only were they broken elsewhere and brought there, but some of them became weathered elsewhere."
     Renfrew believes the figurines — some originally up to a meter high — may have come from regional sanctuaries spread throughout the Cyclades. And pottery finds indicate that the site could have attracted worshippers from as far away as mainland Greece. "Maybe at some point in some life cycle, the figurines were ritually smashed and taken to Keros in some ceremony," he said. "It's going to take a while to sort out what's going on." Experts agree that the elegant marble figurines, which initially had details painted on in bright colors, were highly prized in the early bronze age Cyclades, but still don't understand for what purpose they were made. Some 1,400 have survived, although only 40 percent are of known origin as looters destroyed evidence on the rest.
     The figurines were made following a pattern that changed little over 800 years. They have been variously interpreted as depicting gods or venerated ancestors, serving as replacements for human sacrifice, grave goods — even children's toys. While Renfrew believes they should not be associated with the cemeteries in which many were found, he concedes there is little evidence of how they were used in everyday life.
     In the coming year, excavations will focus on the nearby rock of Daskalio, which Renfrew believes was one of the main Cycladic sites."There are huge quantities of building stone littering the surface, lots of walls to a small height and great quantities of potshards," he said. "It clearly is by Early Bronze Age standards a very large settlement."

Sources: Associated Press, International Herald Tribune, Mathaba News (31 December 2006)